Conduct disorder: new directions in promoting effective parenting and strengthening parent-adolescent relationships.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Although it is always preferable to prevent childhood mental health and behavioural problems, it is not always possible to do so early in their developmental trajectory. Adolescence offers another window of opportunity to intervene and reduce risk or prevent the development of late onset conditions. In this paper, we focus on adolescent Conduct Disorder, noting the special challenges of this developmental period and implications for interventions. We briefly discuss the growing evidence of the importance of parent and family targeted interventions. METHOD: Forty-eight adolescents with severe Conduct Disorder and their caregivers completed questionnaires at the beginning and end of a parent group program (Connect Parent Group). The program is guided by attachment principles and focuses on skill development in the domains of parental attunement, empathy and effective dyadic affect regulation. These skills are the building blocks of secure attachment and important components of effective parenting. RESULTS: Caregivers' reports revealed significant improvements in their perceived parenting competence and satisfaction; reduced adolescent aggressive behaviour, internalizing and externalizing problems; and reduced levels of avoidance in the caregiver-adolescent relationship. CONCLUSION: These findings provide further support for the importance of parent and family focused interventions in the treatment of Conduct Disorder in both children and adolescents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".