Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article propose un examen des aspects problématiques qui entourent l’usage du terme postmoderne. L’oeuvre tardive de Luigi Nono (1926-1990) constitue un excellent point de départ pour une telle étude. Les compositions de la fin de sa carrière, telles Omaggio György Kurtág (1983-1986) et Fragmente-Stille, an Diotima (1980), ont surpris et choqué ses collaborateurs de longue date. Les formes fragmentaires et la nature introvertie de cette musique ont créé l’impression d’une profonde rupture stylistique et technique dans le développement du compositeur. Cette apparence de rupture était vue par de nombreux observateurs comme un signe du déclin d’un certain modernisme (c’est-à-dire l’avant-garde du XXe siècle) et l’annonce de l’éclosion de nouvelles approches, dites postmodernes, de l’art et de la culture. L’auteur démontre que, d’une part, l’apparence de rupture dans l’oeuvre tardive de Nono est surestimée et, d’autre part, que l’idée d’un art musical postmoderne est trompeuse dans la mesure où elle détourne l’attention des éléments de continuité dans la nouvelle musique à la fin du XXe siècle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".