MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Dilution and Penetration of Vertical Negatively Buoyant Thermal Jets

2012· article· en· W2099949641 on OpenAlexafffund
Nadeem Ahmad, R. E. Baddour

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hydraulic Engineering · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFroude numberPenetration (warfare)DilutionMechanicsTurbulencePenetration depthNozzleThermocoupleThermalJet (fluid)PlumeThermodynamicsMeteorologyMaterials sciencePhysicsFlow (mathematics)Optics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Five series of experiments were performed to study the penetration and dilution properties of vertical negatively buoyant thermal jets (thermal fountains). The flow was turbulent, and the densimetric Froude number F based on the radius of the discharge varied from 4.7 to 24. The experiments were conducted in the laboratory by discharging hot water vertically downward into a colder-water environment that had a temperature greater than 15°C. Under these conditions, the water equation of state was practically linear, and the downward negatively buoyant thermal jet was dynamically similar to an upwards negatively buoyant dense jet of equal densimetric Froude number. The temperature fields associated with the negatively buoyant jets were measured with arrays of fast responding thermocouples and were used to study the jet penetration and dilution properties. Detailed analyses of the temperature data revealed large fluctuations of jet penetration in the vertical direction. The mean and maximum vertical jet penetrations obtained in this study using temperature data were consistent with the results of previous studies based on visual data. In contrast, smaller fluctuations of jet penetration occurred in the horizontal direction, and the maximum horizontal penetration of the return flow, at the level of the source (z=0), was δm=1.40 r0F. This value is about one-half of the mean vertical jet penetration. On the other hand, the minimum dilution of the returning fluid at the source height just outside of the nozzle was μmin=0.58F.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hydraulic EngineeringSame topicAerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet FlowsFrench-language works237,207