MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100028936 · doi:10.1430/2266

Gli aspetti istituzionali e la competizione internazionale nell'industria agro alimentare

2000· article· it· W2100028936 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marina Schenkel

Bibliographic record

VenueL'industria · 2000
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicLegal and Labor Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCertificationCompromiseBusinessWelfare economicsInternational tradeDomestic marketInternational marketAgricultural sciencePolitical scienceEconomicsManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Internal European Market and World Trade Organization, the two main institutions regulating the international trade of agro-alimentary products, are analyzed. The recent controversy on Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones) between EC at one side, and US and Canada at the other, is described, and the new trends emerging in the present situation are discussed. The conclusion is that certification procedures can act as a reasonable compromise between opposite interests, but the road to conflict solution resides in mutual recognitions of standards and scientific criteria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.364
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0630.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueL'industriaSame topicLegal and Labor StudiesFrench-language works237,207