MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100032228 · doi:10.1109/glocom.1997.638495

Throughput and delay performance of transport user in congestion controlled hybrid ATM/TDMA networks

2002· article· en· W2100032228 on OpenAlexaff
Malleswara Talla, A.K. Elhakeem, Michel Kadoch

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureConcordia UniversitySonaca (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer networkAsynchronous Transfer ModeComputer scienceThroughputQuality of serviceQueueing theoryPacket lossNetwork congestionNetwork packetAutomatic repeat requestGoodputFlow control (data)Real-time computingHybrid automatic repeat requestWirelessTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The end-to-end throughput and delay performance characteristics are analyzed for a virtual circuit (VC) transport user in a hybrid asynchronous transfer mode/time division multiple access (ATM/TDMA) network. An automatic repeat request (ARQ) transport user is assumed with an underlying ATM cell-level global congestion control in an ATM multiplexer node. The analysis is based on the interaction of packet level control with the queue management at the ATM cell level. The transport user is assumed over M-node VC to analyze the throughput and delay using Norton equivalent queueing model. The transport layer service characteristic of the model is obtained from the end-to-end protocol efficiency of Go-Back-N (GBN) and selective repeat (SR) ARQ schemes. The ATM layer is assumed with a leaky bucket (LB), virtual leaky bucket (VLB), modified LB (mLB), or modified VLB (mVLB) congestion control scheme. A global congestion control scheme prioritizes transit traffic over local traffic, and ensures quality of service (QOS) to several classes of service. Based on the global congestion status, the transport users modulate their end-to-end flow control parameters, i.e., packet size in case of video and voice users, and window size in case of data users. The probability of cell-loss at the ATM layer is reflected at the transport layer to derive the effective throughput and delay characteristics. The mVLB scheme consistently provided better end-to-end throughput and delay performance for both GBN and SR transport users.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.839
Threshold uncertainty score0.548

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207