MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100047630 · doi:10.1109/igarss.1997.615935

Multi-frequency and multi-polarization SAR system analysis with simulation software developed at CSA

2002· article· en· W2100047630 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Yulin Huang, Guy Séguin, N. Sultan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced SAR Imaging Techniques
Canadian institutionsCanadian Space Agency
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSynthetic aperture radarComputer sciencePoint targetSoftwareRadar imagingRadar3D radarSimulationInverse synthetic aperture radarRemote sensingRadar engineering detailsReal-time computingComputer visionTelecommunicationsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The multi-frequency and multi-polarization SAR simulator developed at the Canadian Space Agency (CSA) is aimed to study an advanced SAR system performance in the simulated SAR images. This simulator is designed either as a SAR system simulator which concentrates on the radar system and SAR processing techniques, or as a SAR image product simulator which focuses on a target model and a radar backscattering model, so as to understand SAR polarization characteristics completely. The paper presents the simulation approach of a point target model and a distributed target model for spaceborne SAR which is adopted in the authors' simulator. The current results are given and the status of the SAR simulator software is addressed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2002
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced SAR Imaging TechniquesFrench-language works237,207