MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100064067 · doi:10.1109/mnrc.2008.4683402

AC electroosmotic micropumping with a square spiral microelectrode array

2008· article· en· W2100064067 on OpenAlexafffund
Thomas A. Moore, Yongjun Lai

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersCMC Microsystems
KeywordsMicroelectrodeMicrofluidicsSpiral (railway)Materials scienceSIGNAL (programming language)ElectrohydrodynamicsSquare waveFluid dynamicsFlow velocityMultielectrode arrayVoltageMechanicsElectrodeFlow (mathematics)AcousticsPhysicsElectrical engineeringNanotechnologyMechanical engineeringEngineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An electro-kinetic micropumping device has been designed, experimentally tested and analyzed theoretically using coupled computational fluid dynamic and electrostatic simulations. A microelectrode array uses the principle of AC electroosmosis; bulk fluid motion due to ions driven along microelectrode surfaces by forces stemming from tangential electric fields. Three submerged microelectrode wires, deposited to form a square spiral, had a three-phase traveling-wave applied AC signal to create a net flow. Microsphere tracers were used to measure the flow to determine pumping performance, and compare the fluid velocity and operating frequency to theoretical results. The device presented here demonstrated bi-directional pumping capabilities and the potential for use as both a particle collector and microfluidic pump.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207