Disposition of perfluorinated acid isomers in sprague-dawley rats; Part 1: Single dose
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Perfluorinated acids (PFAs) and their precursors (PFA-precursors) exist in the environment as linear and multiple branched isomers. These isomers are hypothesized to have different biological properties, but no isomer-specific data are currently available. The present study is the first in a two-part project examining PFA isomer-specific uptake, tissue distribution, and elimination in a rodent model. Seven male Sprague-Dawley rats were administered a single gavage dose of approximately 500 microg/kg body weight perfluorooctane sulfonate (C(8)F(17)SO(3)(-), PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid (C(7)F(15)CO(2)H, PFOA), and perfluorononanoic acid (C(8)F(17)CO(2)H, PFNA) and 30 microg/kg body weight perfluorohexane sulfonate (C(6)F(13)SO(3)(-), PFHxS). Over the subsequent 38 d, urine, feces, and tail-vein blood samples were collected intermittently, while larger blood volumes and tissues were collected on days 3 and 38 for isomer analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). For all PFAs, branched isomers generally had lower blood depuration half-lives than the corresponding linear isomer. The most remarkable exception was for the PFOS isomer containing an alpha-perfluoromethyl branch (1m-PFOS), which was threefold more persistent than linear PFOS, possibly due to steric shielding of the hydrophilic sulfonate moiety. For perfluoromonomethyl-branched isomers of PFOS, a structure-property relationship was observed whereby branching toward the sulfonate end of the perfluoroalkyl chain resulted in increased half-lives. For PFHxS, PFOA, and PFOS, preferential elimination of branched isomers occurred primarily via urine, whereas for PFNA preferential elimination of the isopropyl isomer occurred via both urine and feces. Changes in the blood isomer profiles over time and their inverse correlation to isomer elimination patterns in urine, feces, or both provided unequivocal evidence of significant isomer-specific biological handling. Source assignment based on PFA isomer profiles in biota must therefore be conducted with caution, because isomer profiles are unlikely to be conserved in biological samples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".