MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100084340 · doi:10.1093/jb/mvj081

Two Novel Proteins Bind Specifically to Trichosanthin on Choriocarcinoma Cell Membrane

2006· article· en· W2100084340 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Biochemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicToxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Biological Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrichosanthinBiologyCytotoxicityBiochemistryChemistryMolecular biologyCell biologyBiophysicsIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trichosanthin is the active protein component in the Chinese herb Trichosanthes kirilowi, which has distinct pharmacological properties. The cytotoxicity of trichosanthin was demonstrated by its selective inhibition of various choriocarcinoma cells. When Jar cells were treated with trichosanthin, the influx of calcium into the cells was observed by confocal laser scanning microscopy. When the distribution of trichosanthin-binding proteins on Jar cells was studied, two classes of binding sites for trichosanthin were shown by radioligand binding assay. Furthermore, the cytoplasmic membrane of Jar cells was biotinylated and the trichosanthin-binding proteins were isolated with trichosanthin-coupled Sepharose beads. Two protein bands with molecular masses of about 50 kDa and 60 kDa were revealed, further characterization of which should shed light on the mechanism of the selective cytotoxicity of trichosanthin to Jar cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.548

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it