MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100095825 · doi:10.5539/mas.v4n8p24

Solution of Free-Particle Radial Dependant Schrödinger Equation Using He's Homotopy Perturbation Method

2010· article· en· W2100095825 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
A. A. Mahasneh, A. M. Al-Qararah

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFractional Differential Equations Solutions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomotopy analysis methodHomotopy perturbation methodMathematicsPoincaré–Lindstedt methodNonlinear systemPerturbation (astronomy)HomotopyMathematical analysisEmbeddingApplied mathematicsPhysicsComputer scienceQuantum mechanicsPure mathematicsSingular perturbation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Homotopy perturbation method (HPM) is one of the newest analytical methods to solve linear and nonlinear differential equations. In this paper, HPM is used to formulate a new analytic solution of free-particle radial dependent Schrödinger equation. In contrast to the traditional perturbation methods, the homotopy method does not require a small parameter in the equation. In this method, according to the homotopy technique, a homotopy with an embedding parameter is constructed, and the embedding parameter is considered as a small parameter. The obtained result shows the evidence of simplicity, usefulness, and effectiveness of the homotopy perturbation method for obtaining approximate analytical solutions for the radial dependent Schrödinger equation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicFractional Differential Equations SolutionsFrench-language works237,207