Isometric Data Sequences and Data-Modulation Schemes in Fading Channels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In multiplicative fading channels, joint channel estimation and data detection (CE/DD) schemes cannot differentiate among certain sequences of amplitude- and/or phase-modulated (AM/PM) symbols drawn from rotationally invariant signal constellations. This paper identifies these so-called isometric sequences as the main source of performance degradation, and introduces a unifying framework that effectively solves the problem by using asymmetric signal constellations (ASC) and a normalized innovations-based detector. The encompassing nature of the solution is clearly demonstrated by showing that seemingly unrelated previous results, such as training-based solutions, can be viewed as special cases of the modulation-based solution discussed here. A comprehensive analysis, supported by simulation studies, of the relationships among modulation schemes, isometry, and detection performance is provided. Results indicate that the proposed ASC solution offers excellent performance without incurring significant complexity or reducing the transmission rate. Furthermore, it is shown to be robust in various fading rates, and for different signal constellations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".