Patterns of health care utilization and mental health characteristics of pregnant and early postpartum women
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada’s (SOGC) goal of prenatal care is to “reduce perinatal mortality and morbidity, while supporting women’s medical, social and psychological needs.” Research objective: To describe the association between a) maternal characteristics and care provider, and b) between prenatal care (PNC) utilization and risk of postpartum depression (PPD). Methods: Questionnaires administered (N=1347) twice during pregnancy and at four months postpartum measured risk of PPD. PNC utilization was compared to scores on the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression scale, controlling for known risk factors. Results: Adequacy of prenatal care was not related to PPD. Women with lower income were more likely to have received inadequate prenatal care. Differences were observed among women who received their prenatal care from different providers. Conclusion: The lack of evidence of an association between adequate PNC utilization and PPD suggests that there may be missed opportunities to support women’s psychological needs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".