Towards <font>N</font>-alkylated phthalocyanines using 2,3,9,10,16,17,23,24-octaneopentoxyphthalocyanine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
4,5-Dineopentoxyphthalonitrile was prepared from catechol and neopentyl tosylate in three steps. Condensation of this substituted phthalonitrile with lithium metal in 1-pentanol led to 2,3,9,10,16,17,23,24-octaneopentoxyphthalocyanine. Lithiation in tetrahydrofuran gave the dilithium phthalocyanine which on methylation did not give the expected N -methylated product 29,31-dimethylphthalocyanine. The precipitate formed on methylation appeared to be the N +- CH 3 derivative in which one of the peripheral nitrogens was N -methylated. Methylation with 13 CH 3 I likely yielded an N +-methylated phthalocyanine having the requisite increased mass in its mass spectrum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".