MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100184918 · doi:10.1145/2133390.2133393

Evolutionary optimization of low-discrepancy sequences

2012· article· en· W2100184918 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Approximation and Integration
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurse of dimensionalitySequence (biology)Latin hypercube samplingHypercubeComputer scienceAlgorithmPseudorandom number generatorGenerator (circuit theory)Evolutionary algorithmMathematicsTheoretical computer scienceMathematical optimizationCombinatoricsArtificial intelligencePower (physics)Monte Carlo methodStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Low-discrepancy sequences provide a way to generate quasi-random numbers of high dimensionality with a very high level of uniformity. The nearly orthogonal Latin hypercube and the generalized Halton sequence are two popular methods when it comes to generate low-discrepancy sequences. In this article, we propose to use evolutionary algorithms in order to find optimized solutions to the combinatorial problem of configuring generators of these sequences. Experimental results show that the optimized sequence generators behave at least as well as generators from the literature for the Halton sequence and significantly better for the nearly orthogonal Latin hypercube.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.565
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it