Joint Channel and Frequency Offset Estimation for Oversampled Perfect Reconstruction Filter Bank Transceivers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, DFT-based oversampled perfect reconstruction filter banks (OPRFB), as a special form of filtered multitone, have shown great promises for applications to multicarrier modulation. Still, accurate frequency synchronization and channel equalization are needed for their reliable operation in practical scenarios. In this paper, we first derive a data-aided joint maximum likelihood (ML) estimator of the carrier frequency offset (CFO) and the channel impulse response (CIR) for OPRFB transceiver systems operating over frequency selective fading channels. Then, by exploiting the structural and spectral properties of these systems, we are able to considerably reduce the complexity of the proposed estimator through simplifications of the underlying likelihood function. The Cramer Rao bound on the variance of unbiased CFO and CIR estimators is also derived. The performance of the proposed ML estimator is investigated by means of numerical simulations under realistic conditions with CFO and frequency selective fading channels. The effects of different pilot schemes on the estimation performance for applications over time-invariant and mobile time-varying channels are also examined. The results show that the proposed joint ML estimator exhibits an excellent performance, where it can accurately estimate the unknown CFO and CIR parameters for the various experimental setups under consideration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".