Molecular dissection of IZUMO1, a sperm protein essential for sperm-egg fusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although the membrane fusion of spermatozoon and egg cells is the central event of fertilization, the underlying molecular mechanism remains virtually unknown. Gene disruption studies have showed that IZUMO1 on spermatozoon and CD9 on oocyte are essential transmembrane proteins in sperm-egg fusion. In this study, we dissected IZUMO1 protein to determine the domains that were required for the function of sperm-egg fusion. We found that a fragment of the N terminus (Asp5 to Leu113) interacts with fertilization inhibitory antibodies. It also binds to the egg surface and effectively inhibits fusion in vitro. We named this fragment 'IZUMO1 putative functional fragment (IZUMO1PFF)'. Surprisingly, IZUMO1PPF still maintains binding ability on the egg surface of Cd9(-/-) eggs. A series of biophysical measurements using circular dichroism, sedimentation equilibrium and small angle X-ray scattering revealed that IZUMO1PFF is composed of an N-terminal unfolded structure and a C-terminal ellipsoidal helix dimer. Egg binding and fusion inhibition were not observed in the IZUMO1PFF derivative, which was incapable of helix formation. These findings suggest that the formation of a helical dimer at the N-terminal region of IZUMO1 is required for its function. Cos-7 cells expressing the whole IZUMO1 molecule bound to eggs, and IZUMO1 accumulated at the interface between the two cells, but fusion was not observed. These observations suggest that IZUMO1 alone cannot promote sperm-egg membrane fusion, but it works as a factor that is related to the cellular surface interaction, such as the tethering of the membranes by a helical region corresponding to IZUMO1PFF-core.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".