MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100209550

압력과 산화몰분율이 그라파이트 목삽입재의 삭마율에 미치는 영향

2013· article· ko· W2100209550 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
함희철, 강윤구

Bibliographic record

Venue한국추진공학회 학술대회논문집 · 2013
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldEngineering
TopicMilitary Technology and Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

고체 로켓 추진기관의 노즐목 삽입재에 적용하는 그라파이트의 삭마율 특성을 분석하였다. 지상연소 시험은 3종류의 일반적인 노즐형태를 갖는 추진기관을 사용하여 수행하였다. 즉, De-Laval 형태, 토출관 형태, 내삽 형태이다. 13종류의 서로 다른 형상의 추진기관에 다양한 추진제를 적용하였고, 노즐목 위치에 흑연을 적용하여 총 31회의 연소시험을 수행하였다. 분석결과 그라파이트의 삭마율은 연소실 압력이 상승함에 따라, 산화몰분율이 증가함에 따라 증가함을 알 수 있다.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.017
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue한국추진공학회 학술대회논문집Same topicMilitary Technology and StrategiesFrench-language works237,207