MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100222787 · doi:10.1109/mwsym.2006.249421

TLM-based Self-adjoint Sensitivities of S-parameters with Time-domain Electromagnetic Solvers

2006· article· en· W2100222787 on OpenAlexaff
Ying Li, Natalia K. Nikolova, Mohamed H. Bakr

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransmission-line matrix methodSolverDiscretizationFinite-difference time-domain methodSensitivity (control systems)Transmission lineElectromagnetic fieldComputational electromagneticsComputationComputer scienceVoltageTime domainElectromagneticsElectronic engineeringPhysicsMathematicsAlgorithmMathematical analysisElectrical engineeringEngineeringOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a self-adjoint approach to S-parameter sensitivity computation with time-domain electromagnetic (EM) simulators based on the transmission-line matrix (TLM) discretization scheme. The method is applicable with any EM simulator, which can export either the electric field or the incident TLM voltages at user defined points. Our technique converts the electric and magnetic field solution into TLM voltages if the latter are not available (e.g., in FDTD-based simulators). The S-parameter derivatives are computed as an independent post-process whose computational requirements are negligible compared to the full-wave system analysis. Adjoint simulations are not needed if the problem is homogeneous. Our approach is illustrated through waveguide problems solved with a commercial TLM solver

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical MethodsFrench-language works237,207