Antisense RNA Down-Regulation of bcl-2 Expression in DU145 Prostate Cancer Cells Does Not Diminish the Cytostatic Effects of G3139 (Oblimersen)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Inhibition of the function of the bcl-2 protein has been postulated to sensitize cells to cytotoxic chemotherapy, and thus provides an attractive target for investigative therapies. G3139, a phosphorothioate antisense oligonucleotide targeted to the initiation codon region of the bcl-2 mRNA, is currently being evaluated in several Phase II and Phase III clinical trials. However, the mechanism of action of this molecule appears to depend on a combination of antisense plus nonantisense events. Indeed, the very idea that bcl-2 is a critical target is, at least in part, an extrapolation from experiments in which intracellular bcl-2 protein concentrations have been dramatically increased, yielding chemoresistant cells. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In this work, we down-regulated the expression of bcl-2 protein by 80-90% by two different antisense RNA strategies (antisense RNA and small interfering RNA) in DU145 prostate cancer cells. RESULTS: Even after down-regulation of bcl-2 protein expression by either one of these strategies, the cellular phenotype induced by subsequent G3139 treatment (inhibition of cellular growth and the generation of reactive oxygen species) was essentially identical to that induced in mock-infected or wild-type DU145 cells in which bcl-2 protein expression had not been down-regulated previously. CONCLUSIONS: These results strongly suggest that bcl-2 expression in DU145 cells is not strongly associated with the prolife phenotype and that the mechanism by which G3139 produces its cytostatic effects in this cell line is bcl-2 independent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".