Cd accumulation in roots and shoots of durum wheat: the roles of transpiration rate and apoplastic bypass
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cadmium is readily taken up from soils by plants, depending on soil chemistry, and variably among species and cultivars; altered transpiration and xylem transport and/or translocation in the phloem could cause this variation in Cd accumulation, some degree of which is heritable. Using Triticum turgidum var. durum cvs Kyle and Arcola (high and low grain Cd accumulating, respectively), the objectives of this study were to determine if low-concentration Cd exposure alters transpiration, to relate transpiration to accumulation of Cd in roots and shoots at several life stages, and to evaluate the role of apoplastic bypass in the accumulation of Cd in shoots. The low abundance isotope (106)Cd was used to probe Cd translocation in plants which had been exposed to elemental Cd or were Cd-naïve; apoplastic bypass was monitored using the fluorescent dye PTS (8-hydroxy-1,3,6-pyrenetrisulphonate). Differential accumulation of Cd by 'Kyle' and 'Arcola' could be partially attributed to the effect of Cd on transpiration, as exposure to low concentrations of Cd increased mass flow and concomitant Cd accumulation in 'Kyle'. Distinct from this, exposure of 'Arcola' to low concentrations of Cd reduced translocation of Cd from roots to shoots relative to root accumulation of Cd. It is possible, but not tested here, that sequestration mechanisms (such as phytochelatin production, as demonstrated by others) are the genetically controlled difference between these two cultivars that results in differential Cd accumulation. These results also suggest that apoplastic bypass was not a major pathway of Cd transport from the root to the shoot in these plants, and that most of the shoot Cd resulted from uptake into the stele of the root via the symplastic pathway.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".