MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100270281 · doi:10.1109/jqe.2011.2149498

Analytic Theory of Strongly-Coupled Microring Resonators

2011· article· en· W2100270281 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResonatorCoupling (piping)PhysicsTopology (electrical circuits)Formalism (music)Matrix (chemical analysis)Coupled mode theoryQuantum mechanicsOpticsRefractive indexMaterials scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Analytic theory for strongly-coupled microring resonators of general 2-D coupling topologies is developed based on the field coupling formalism. The theory allows simple characteristic equation for coupled microring resonators (CMR) of general coupling topology to be formulated, from which closed form analytical expressions of the transmission responses of the device can be derived. It is also shown that any CMR structure is characterized by a field coupling matrix which can be decomposed into a direct and indirect coupling term. The indirect coupling matrix can give rise to prominent strong coupling effects, such as indirect coupling induced transparency, that are not observed in weakly coupled microring resonators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.510
Threshold uncertainty score0.525

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it