Extra-pituitary growth hormone in peripheral tissues of early chick embryos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Early embryonic growth is independent of pituitary growth hormone (GH), since it occurs prior to the differentiation of pituitary somatotrophs. Embryogenesis is therefore thought to be regulated by local growth factors. As GH is now known to be produced in many extrapituitary sites, in which it acts in an autocrine or paracrine manner, the possibility that extra-pituitary GH may participate in embryogenesis and organogenesis was assessed by determining the immunocytochemical presence and location of GH- and GH-receptor (GHR)-like proteins in the peripheral tissues of chick embryos during their 21-day incubation period. Immunoreactive (IR)-GH, detectable by a monoclonal and two polyclonal antibodies for chicken GH, was specifically and ubiquitously present in tissues of 3-day-old embryos. At embryonic day (ED) 5, IR-GH was widespread in ectodermal, mesodermal and endodermal tissues, but it was not present in every cell of each tissue. IR-GH was particularly abundant i! n the neural tube, notochord, limb bud, somites, heart, stomach, liver, kidney, Wolffian duct and the amnion. By ED8, IR-GH was still widespread and was now present in limb bud cartilage, although the heart and liver were no longer GH immunoreactive. GH receptor immunoreactivity was also present in most tissues and cells of ED3-ED8 embryos. These results demonstrate that extrapituitary GH is abundantly present during early embryogenesis, prior to the differentiation of pituitary somatotrophs (at ED12). Since GH- and GHR-like proteins are present in most tissues of the chick embryo, it is proposed that extrapituitary GH may act as a local growth factor during embryonic development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".