MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100278301 · doi:10.2337/db12-0330

Linking Inflammation to the Brain-Liver Axis

2012· letter· en· W2100278301 on OpenAlexafffund
Patricia I. Mighiu, B Filippi, Tony K.T. Lam

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes · 2012
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
Canadian institutionsDiabetes CanadaUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsInsulin resistanceEndocrinologyInternal medicineProinflammatory cytokineInflammationAdipose tissueTumor necrosis factor alphaGlucose homeostasisInsulin receptorBiologyInsulinMetabolic syndromeDiabetes mellitusMedicineImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The upregulation of plasma inflammatory bio-markers in individuals with metabolic syndromeimplies that activation of the innate immune re-sponse contributes to the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes (1). Today, a large array of studies has demon-strated that activation of inflammatory pathways underlies obesity-associated insulin resistance at the liver and fat (2–4). However, little is known regarding whether obesity induces inflammation in the brain thereby disrupting the ability of insulin to control glucose homeostasis. Hotamisligil et al. (5) first established a link between obesity and the increased production of inflammatory molecules by demonstrating that tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a), a proinflammatory cytokine, is overexpressed in the adipose tissue of obese mice. This finding was con-firmed in humans with obesity and insulin resistance (6,7). TNF-a induces peripheral insulin resistance in rodents (8,9) and alters insulin sensitivity and glucose homeostasis in

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0130.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetesSame topicAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic DiseasesFrench-language works237,207