MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100302985 · doi:10.1142/s021819591360011x

ROBUST NONPARAMETRIC SIMPLIFICATION OF POLYGONAL CHAINS

2013· article· en· W2100302985 on OpenAlexaff
Stéphane Durocher, Alexandre Leblanc, Jason Morrison, Matthew Skala

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Computational Geometry & Applications · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Geometry and Mesh Generation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubsequencePolygonal chainCombinatoricsCardinality (data modeling)Simple (philosophy)Nonparametric statisticsSequence (biology)MathematicsMonotonic functionChain (unit)PiecewisePiecewise linear functionPlane (geometry)Binary logarithmAlgorithmDiscrete mathematicsComputer scienceGeometryBounded functionRegular polygonMathematical analysisStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we present a novel nonparametric method for simplifying piecewise linear curves and we apply this method as a statistical approximation of structure within sequential data in the plane. Specifically, given a sequence P of n points in the plane that determine a simple polygonal chain consisting of n−1 segments, we describe algorithms for selecting a subsequence Q ⊂ P (including the first and last points of P) that determines a second polygonal chain to approximate P, such that the number of crossings between the two polygonal chains is maximized, and the cardinality of Q is minimized among all such maximizing subsets of P. Our algorithms have respective running times O(n 2 log n) (respectively, [Formula: see text]) when P is monotonic and O(n 2 log 2 n) (respectively, [Formula: see text]) when P is any simple polygonal chain in the Real RAM model (respectively, in the Word RAM model).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.757
Threshold uncertainty score0.916

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Computational Geometry & ApplicationsSame topicComputational Geometry and Mesh GenerationFrench-language works237,207