MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Fuzzy Adaptive Cruise Control system with speed sign detection capability

2014· article· en· W2100357954 on OpenAlexaff
Raazi Rizvi, Shivam Kalra, Chirag Gosalia, Shahryar Rahnamayan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Canadian institutionsLakeridge HealthSinai Health SystemOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCruise controlAdvanced driver assistance systemsComputer scienceSpeed limitLane departure warning systemFuzzy logicFeature (linguistics)Fuzzy control systemControl systemAutomotive engineeringReal-time computingControl (management)EngineeringArtificial intelligenceTransport engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advanced Driver Assistance System (ADAS) is one of latest innovations in the auto-mobile industry and has become a premium feature in many luxury vehicles. ADAS assists drivers by integrating multiple safety and convenience features into a single system. Current ADAS technology usually comprises of an Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) system in combination with one or more warning/prevention systems. Such as lane departure, collision avoidance, and parking assist systems. This paper outlines a fuzzy logic based ADAS with integrated speed sign detection (SSD) capability. The described system improves safety of the vehicle by dynamically adjusting the speed of the ACC in accordance with the speed limit of the road. The proposed ADAS system will be helpful in reducing speeding violations and enhancing smoother cruise control in heavy traffic conditions. All system design, implementation and testing was done using the MATLAB development environment, and TORCS virtual car simulator.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.162
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyFrench-language works237,207