MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100372036 · doi:10.5539/jsd.v2n2p187

The Exploitation and the Development Perspectives of New Environmental Foliage Fiber

2009· article· en· W2100372036 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Guangxiao Wang, Yi Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sustainable Development · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicTextile materials and evaluations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNatural (archaeology)TextileFiberNatural fiberTextile industryAgricultureEnvironmental scienceEcologyGeographyMaterials scienceBiologyComposite materialArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the author reviewed the development of the natural fabrics, expounding the actuality of the exploitation on new type environmental natural fabrics, analyzing the production and the traits of the natural fabrics and the chemical fiber, and pointed out the significance of empoldering new environmental foliage fibers to meet the demand of textile machining. The author introduced several kinds of new environmental foliage fibers, and discussed making good use of the natural sources and the trash from the agriculture has been an obvious characteristic of developing green fiber and eco-textile in this paper as while. This paper further analyzes the development and market potential of the new environmental foliage fiber.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.212
Threshold uncertainty score0.338

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sustainable DevelopmentSame topicTextile materials and evaluationsFrench-language works237,207