MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100393978 · doi:10.7451/cbe.2014.56.6.13

Phosphorus removal from solids separated hog manure by air stripping.

2015· article· en· W2100393978 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Biosystems Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhosphorus and nutrient management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgilent Technologies
KeywordsManurePhosphorusStripping (fiber)Environmental scienceWaste managementAir strippingEnvironmental chemistryAgronomyEnvironmental engineeringChemistryMaterials scienceBiologyEngineeringWastewater

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Removal of phosphorus (P) from hog manure can be accomplished by struvite (MgNH4PO4) precipitation but the use of liquid hog manure in most reactors is hindered by manure total solids (TS), low soluble P concentration and interfering ions such as calcium (Ca). In addition, the cost of typical alkali and magnesium (Mg) additions adds significantly to reactor operational costs. Anaerobic fermentation can increase acidity of liquid manures by increasing both VFA and carbonic acid content. This pre-treatment increases soluble P by dissolving P solids in the acid environment and also enables pH increase by air stripping CO2 and carbonic acid. Manure solids separation technologies such as a centrifuge or rotary press produce a liquid stream with TS of

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.247
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it