MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100422991 · doi:10.1364/josab.19.002250

Poly(p-phenylenevinylene) derivatives: new promising materials for nonlinear all-optical waveguide switching

2002· article· en· W2100422991 on OpenAlexaff
M. A. Bader, G. Marowsky, Ayi Bahtiar, Kaloian Koynov, Christoph Bubeck, H. Tillmann, Hans‐Heinrich Hörhold, Suresh Pereira

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Optical Society of America B · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceWaveguideOptical switchBand gapPhotonicsOptoelectronicsPlanarGratingPhotobleachingFiber Bragg gratingPolymerOpticsComposite materialFluorescence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Several new derivatives of poly(p-phenylenevinylene) (PPV) are investigated regarding their linear and nonlinear optical material and waveguide properties, including their nonlinear photonic bandgap properties that are induced by photoablated periodic Bragg gratings. The new materials were prepared by means of the polycondensation route, which yields polymers with excellent solubilities and film-forming properties. Comparative data suggest that the new polycondensation-type MEH-PPV (completely soluble, strictly linear and fully conjugated), in particular, is the most promising polymer under investigation to fulfill the requirements for all-optical switching in planar waveguide photonic bandgap structures. UV-photobleaching techniques and photoablation in the UV, VIS, and near-infrared ranges at different pulse durations are investigated. Homogeneous submicrometer gratings that serve as Bragg reflectors have been fabricated in MEH-PPV thin films by application of these methods. The great potential of this type of materials for nonlinear all-optical switching applications that arises from their unique optical properties and their patterning behavior is discussed in detail. Numerical simulations of a switching device based on gap-soliton formation in a nonlinear periodic waveguide structure with the newly obtained material data have been carried out. We show that one can expect photonic bandgap all-optical switching in MEH-PPV planar waveguides. Device performance considering different grating parameters is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.400
Threshold uncertainty score0.646

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations67
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Optical Society of America BSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207