MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100463743 · doi:10.1109/oceans.1993.326006

Sidescan sonar detection performance with PRN coded signals

2002· article· en· W2100463743 on OpenAlexaff
D. Haller, David Lemon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsASL Environmental Sciences (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSonarReverberationComputer scienceWaveformAcousticsBandwidth (computing)Signal processingTransducerSIGNAL (programming language)Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Speech recognitionArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsRadarPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A sonar transmission signal that has enhanced the operation of conventional 50 kHz depth sounders in noise-limited environments has been applied to a sidescan sonar application where the acoustic background is dominated by reverberation. By transmitting a pseudorandom noise (PRN) source pulse with a high bandwidth-time product, and detecting the returned signals by cross-correlation with the source waveform, the potential processing gain is greatly increased and high resolution in both time end frequency is achieved. In a sidescan application, the depth-sounder transducer was aimed horizontally and driven with a variety of PRN coded and uncoded source signals. An artificial target array was deployed on the bottom at a shallow water test site to simulate a cluttered background against which detection performance for pre-existing bottom targets could be evaluated. Detection performance of the PRN coded signals has been found superior to all uncoded signal types both for cluttered and uncluttered backgrounds.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207