MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100472877 · doi:10.7202/1022850ar

Religion, « communauté » et citoyenneté : le cas des écoles Steiner, musulmane et juive en contexte montréalais

2014· article· fr· W2100472877 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Stéphanie Tremblay

Bibliographic record

VenueDiversité urbaine · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Education and Schools
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nous proposons, à partir d’une étude ethnographique menée dans la région de Montréal, d’explorer la conception de la citoyenneté véhiculée au sein de trois écoles privées de groupes ou de courants minoritaires (Steiner, musulmane et juive). Après avoir dressé un rapide panorama des critiques adressées aux écoles religieuses dans les débats éducatifs, sociaux et politiques, nous aborderons d’un point de vue théorique les notions decommunautééducative et decitoyenneté. Ces précisions nous permettront de mettre en lumière comment les enseignants de ces trois écoles cherchent à développer, par des voies à la fois différentes et convergentes, une formation du citoyen porteuse d’un « particularisme universel » (Riedel 2008). Les trois écoles aspirent en effet, malgré leurs spécificités, à s’ouvrir à la diversité ambiante et à la participation de leurs élèves au reste de la société, mais ceci à travers un vecteur spirituel ou religieux particulier, servant dedais sacréaux valeurs civiques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.395

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0150.021
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiversité urbaineSame topicReligious Education and SchoolsFrench-language works237,207