MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100479211 · doi:10.5539/apr.v4n3p39

Estimation of Natural Radioactivity in Water and Soil in some Villages of Irbid City

2012· article· en· W2100479211 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicRadioactivity and Radon Measurements
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadonNuclear trackEnvironmental scienceSoil testSoil gasSoil waterCR-39HumidityHydrology (agriculture)Relative humidityRadon gasWater sourceMineralogyDetectorSoil scienceSolid-stateGeologyGeographyChemistryMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presented the results of measurements of radon gas (Rn222) in the air of soil and water in the villages of Al-Rafid and Aqraba (north of Jordan) by using solid state nuclear track detectors (SSNTDs) that commercially known as (CR-39). About 160 detectors were placed in soil of two villages at 40 cm depth. Soil planted detectors were gathered 17 days past plantation. In addition, the study presented the results of measurements of radon concentration in water of springs, wells and drinking water obtained from networks. We conducted a study of radon concentrations in the water through 220 water samples from the study area (Al-Rafid and Aqraba villages). The retrieved detectors were chemically etched using KOH solution of 30% concentration at temperature of 70 0C for 8 hours. The alpha track density on the surface of (CR -39) detectors was measured using an optical microscope at proper magnification. It was found that the concentrations of radon in Al-Rafid soil were 1.76, 5.0, 4.8 and 2.03 kBq/m3 in the regions of East, West, North and South, respectively, while the average radon concentrations in soil regions of Aqraba village were 2.0, 7.1, 6.01 and 3.7 kBq/m3 in East, West, North and South, respectively. In general we note the relatively high concentrations of radon in the air of soil in the study area and the reason that this study conducted in the winter, which is characterized by a lack of drought, high humidity and low temperatures that reduces the opportunity for good ventilation rates.The study also provided the results of measurements of radon in the waters of Al-Rafid and Aqraba villages. The highest concentration of radon in spring's water of Al-Rafid village was in Busta spring and the lowest concentration in Al-Rafid spring while the average radon in Aqraba spring was 2.6 Bq/L. The radon concentration in water wells of Al-Rafid village was ranged from 1.8 Bq/L in East region to 5.3 Bq/L in West region. However, the results showed that the radon concentrations in wells of Aqraba village were highest from radon concentration in wells of Al-Rafid village, where the concentrations were 2.7, 6.3, 5.5 and 4.0 Bq/L in regions of East, West, North and South, respectively. The average radon concentration in drinking water obtained from networks in Al-Rafid village was 1.8 Bq/L which is less than average radon concentration in water obtained from networks in Aqraba village 2.4 Bq/L. Concentration of radon in the water within the limits of international

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.252
Threshold uncertainty score0.404

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.174
GPT teacher head0.469
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it