MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100500106 · doi:10.1074/jbc.275.7.4537

A Tripartite Nuclear Localization Signal in the PDZ-domain Protein L-periaxin

2000· article· en· W2100500106 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Diane L. Sherman, Peter Brophy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHereditary Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of LeedsUniversity of Oxford
KeywordsPDZ domainSchwann cellBiologyNucleusCell biologyPeripheral nervous systemMyelinNuclear localization sequenceEmbryonic stem cellNervous systemCentral nervous systemNeuroscienceGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The murine Periaxin gene encodes two PDZ-domain proteins in myelin-forming Schwann cells of the vertebrate peripheral nervous system (Dytrych, L., Sherman, D. L., Gillespie, C. S., and Brophy, P. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 5794-5800). Here we show that L-periaxin is targeted to the nucleus of embryonic Schwann cells. Subsequently, the protein redistributes to the plasma membrane processes of the myelinating Schwann cell where it is believed to function in a signaling complex. In contrast, L-periaxin remains in the nucleus when expressed ectopically in oligodendrocytes, the myelin-forming glia of the central nervous system. The nuclear localization signal (NLS) is basic and tripartite and comprises three signals that act synergistically. Nuclear targeting of L-periaxin is energy-dependent and is inhibited by cell-cell contact. These data show that L-periaxin is a member of a growing family of proteins that can shuttle between the nucleus and cortical signaling/adherence complexes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations67
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicHereditary Neurological DisordersFrench-language works237,207