Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this essay, I study about the architectural change and the management of the Gyeonghuigung palace in Jeongjo’s reign. In his Crown-prince days, King Jeongjo/正祖lived in this palace and wrote many articles such as poems, narratives about this palace. One of them is Gyeonghuigungji/慶熙宮志, describing the function and relative location of all buildings under the concept of Samjo/三朝.He built a library in the name of Jeongsaekdang/貞堂to Jonhyungak/尊賢閣nearby Heungjeongdang/興政堂. After the death of King Yeongjo, the grandfather of Jeongjo, Jajeongjeon/資政殿 was designated as Binjeon/殯殿, the Hall where a coffin is placed until the funeral day, and Taenyungjeon/泰寧殿as Honjeon/魂殿, the Hall where a memorial service is held for the late king during three years. In the tenth year of Jeongjo, Crown-prince Munhyo Seja/文孝世子died, Taenyungjon was designated as Honjeon. So he enlarged the west-nothern quarter of Gyeonghuigung palace and newly built two gates such as Jeongtaemoon/正兌門and Youngseonmoom/寧善門between Taenyungmoon/泰寧門and Geumsangmoon/金商門. It was a good chance within ten years to him to repair the problematic buildings and stone walls of Gyeonghuigung palace. In the 11th, 14th, 15th, 21st year of Jeongjo, Gyeonghuigung palace was continuously repaired and that the 23rd year, the welcoming ceremony of Chinese Representatives was held in Sungjeongjon/崇政殿, the royal audience chamber of Gyeonghuigung palace. King Soonjo, the son of Jeongjo, resided in Gyeonghuigung palace four and half years intermittently in his reign. Especially He changed the name of four buildings from Jangrakjon/長樂殿, Heungjeongdang/興政堂, Jajeongjeon/資政殿, Kwangmyungjeon/光明殿to chwihwajeon/翠華殿, Youngmundang/迎文堂, Younyoungjeon延英殿/, Jangrakjeon長樂殿. I don’t know the reason why he contrive the new name. In the 29th year of Soonjo, naejeon/內殿of Gyeonghuigung palace was burnt down. After the reconstruction in the 31st year of Soonjo, the image of many buildings was changed, so became incongrous with the image of Seolgwoldoan/西闕圖案. I interpreted that this painting was produced in the reign of Soonjo with many reasons.But I cannot help defering dating till a later date.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".