MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100514479 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.110910

Canadian lifestyle choices: a public health failure

2011· editorial· en· W2100514479 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
P. C. Hebert, Matthew B. Stanbrook, Noni MacDonald, K. Flegel, J. Coutts

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2011
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicSodium Intake and Health
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Public healthJournal of Public HealthComputer sciencePublic health policyGerontologyMedicineHealth policyNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, we caught up with Mister and Missus Average Canadian. Like classmates at our high school reunions (but Hey, not us of course!), they’ve changed a lot over the years, thanks in no small part to our federal government’s health policies. Back in the day, Mister Average Canadian was a

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.036
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score0.694

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.036
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0100.006
Scholarly communication0.0100.004
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0210.032
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicSodium Intake and HealthFrench-language works237,207