Control of Short Length-Scale Rotating Stall Inception on a High-Speed Axial Compressor With Plasma Actuation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a computational assessment of the use of Single Dielectric Barrier Discharge (SDBD), or plasma, actuators for the suppression of short-length scale (spike) stall inception in a transonic axial compressor. Casing plasma actuation has the potential to provide a robust and effective stall suppression device without compromising compressor performance. The objective of this work is to determine the optimum actuator location and actuation strength needed to suppress spike stall inception at transonic speeds without imposing a penalty on compressor performance. This is done through the implementation of an actuator model in a turbomachinery CFD code for simulations of a transonic research compressor rotor passage to measure the effectiveness of casing plasma actuation in delaying the tip clearance flow criteria that are believed to lead to the formation of spike disturbances. Results show that the casing plasma actuator should be positioned near the rotor leading edge so as to optimize the impact on the interface between the incoming and tip clearance flows as well as for practical consideration. Simulations also indicate that the required actuator strength is higher than that of typical SDBD actuators while still remaining within practical achievable limits. These results will form the basis for experimental validation of the concept in the corresponding research compressor rig in the near future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it