MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Spectral distortions to the cosmic microwave background from the recombination of hydrogen and helium

2006· article· en· W2100545680 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCosmic microwave backgroundRecombinationSpectral lineLine (geometry)Distortion (music)HeliumWavelengthCOSMIC cancer database

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recombination of hydrogen and helium at z∼ 1000–7000 gives unavoidable distortions to the cosmic microwave background (CMB) spectrum. We present a detailed calculation of the line intensities arising from the Lyman α (Lyα) (2p–1s) and two-photon (2s–1s) transitions for the recombination of hydrogen, as well as the corresponding lines from helium. We give an approximate formula for the strength of the main recombination line distortion on the CMB in different cosmologies; this peak occurring at about 170 μm. We also find a previously undescribed long-wavelength peak (which we call the pre-recombination peak) from the lines of the 2p–1s transitions, which are formed before significant recombination of the corresponding atoms occurred. Detailed calculations of the two-photon emission-line shapes are presented here for the first time. The frequencies of the photons emitted from the two-photon transition have a wide spectrum and this causes the location of the peak of the two-photon line of hydrogen to be located almost at the same wavelength as the main Lyα peak. The helium lines also give distortions at similar wavelengths, so that the combined distortion has a complex shape. The detection of this distortion would provide direct supporting evidence that the Universe was indeed once a plasma. Moreover, the distortions are a sensitive probe of physics during the time of recombination. Although the spectral distortion is overwhelmed by dust emission from the Galaxy, and is maximum at wavelengths roughly where the cosmic far-infrared background peaks, it may be able to tailor an experiment to detect its non-trivial shape.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesFrench-language works237,207