MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100572448 · doi:10.1149/05012.0459ecst

Photothermal Cantilever Deflection Spectroscopy

2013· article· en· W2100572448 on OpenAlexafffund
Seonghwan Kim, Dongkyu Lee, Rachel Thundat, Mehrdad Bagheri, Samgmin Jeon, Thomas Thundat

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMechanical and Optical Resonators
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsCantileverPhotothermal therapyDeflection (physics)SpectroscopyMoleculeInfrared spectroscopyInfraredMaterials scienceChemistryOpticsAbsorption spectroscopyNanotechnologyOptoelectronicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)PhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A real-time technique that does not rely on chemical interfaces or biological receptors for molecular identification of picogram quantities of biomaterials such as DNA molecules in a high throughput fashion is described. This technique combines the extremely high sensitivity of microfabricated bi-material cantilever beams with the high selectivity of mid infrared (IR) spectroscopy to nanomechanically transduce the photon absorption-induced temperature variations of the molecules. Picogram amounts of target molecules were first adsorbed on the cantilever without using any receptors. Illuminating a bi-material cantilever sequentially with a mid-IR radiation results in photon absorption by the molecule at a certain wavelength, which results in a small temperature variation, and the resultant deflection of the bi-material cantilever. A plot of cantilever deflection as a function of an illuminating wavelength closely follows the IR absorption spectrum of the target molecules. We have used this technique to rapidly identify different DNA strands.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicMechanical and Optical ResonatorsFrench-language works237,207