MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100622549 · doi:10.1088/0951-7715/21/7/005

Chaotic response of the 2D semi-geostrophic and 3D quasi-geostrophic equations to gentle periodic forcing

2008· article· en· W2100622549 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNonlinearity · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeostrophic windMathematicsChaoticForcing (mathematics)Mathematical analysisVorticityShearing (physics)VortexEuler equationsClassical mechanicsMechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Symmetries and Hamiltonian structure are combined with Melnikov's method to show a set of exact solutions to the 2D semi-geostrophic equations in an elliptical tank responding chaotically to gentle periodic forcing of the domain eccentricity (or of the potential vorticity, for that matter) which are sinusoidal in time with nearly any period. A similar approach confirms the chaotic response of the quasi-geostrophic equations to gentle periodic forcing by an external shearing field. Our approach simplifies and strengthens the proof by Bertozzi (upon which it is based) concerning the chaotic response of Kirchoff elliptical vortex patches to gentle shearing in the 2D Euler equations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it