MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100670304 · doi:10.3171/spi.2005.3.6.0495

Spinal hemangioblastoma containing metastatic renal cell carcinoma in von Hippel—Lindau disease

2005· article· en· W2100670304 on OpenAlexaff
Meriç A. Altinoz, Carlo Santaguida, Marie‐Christine Guiot, Rolando F. Del Maestro

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurosurgery Spine · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHemangioblastomaMedicineVon Hippel–Lindau diseaseRenal cell carcinomaPathologySpinal cordLaminectomyMetastasisLesionSpinal cord compressionDiseaseInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors describe the case of a patient with von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease in which a spinal hemangioblastoma contained metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The literature on tumor-to-tumor metastasis associated with VHL disease of the central nervous system (CNS) is reviewed. Midthoracic back pain developed in this 43-year-old man with a left-sided radicular component 2 years after he underwent resection of a left RCC. Radiological findings demonstrated a T6-7 intradural intramedullary lesion. A T5-8 laminectomy and gross-total resection of the spinal cord mass were performed. Light and electron microscopic examination showed features of hemangioblastoma, which contained metastatic foci of RCC. Genetic analysis demonstrated the presence of a deleting mutation in the first exon (nt. 394-406) of the VHL locus, truncating 16 amino acids (N61-77) from the first beta sheet in the VHL protein. A review of the literature revealed that RCC-to-CNS hemangioblastoma is the second most common donor-recipient tumor association among the tumor-to-tumor metastases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.700
Threshold uncertainty score0.841

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurosurgery SpineSame topicCancer, Hypoxia, and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207