MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100680488 · doi:10.1109/ic2e.2014.15

Analytics-as-a-Service (AaaS) Tool for Unstructured Data Mining

2014· article· en· W2100680488 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicData Quality and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoSQLComputer scienceUnstructured dataData warehouseBig dataSchema (genetic algorithms)AnalyticsStandardizationData scienceService (business)DatabaseData miningInformation retrieval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Analytics-as-a-Service (AaaS) has become indispensable because it affords stakeholders to discover knowledge in Big Data. Previously, data stored in data warehouses follow some schema and standardization which leads to efficient data mining. However, the "Big Data" epoch has witnessed the rise of structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data, a trend that motivated enterprises to employ the NoSQL data storages to accommodate the high-dimensional data. In this paper, we introduce an AaaS tool that aims at accomplishing terms and topics extraction and organization from unstructured data sources such as NoSQL databases and textual contents (e.g., websites). The primary accomplishment in this paper is the detail justification of the architectural design of our proposed framework. This includes the proposed algorithms (e.g., concurrency search, linear search, etc.) and the performance of macro tasks such as filtering, tagging, and so on.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.706
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.361
GPT teacher head0.464
Teacher spread0.103 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicData Quality and ManagementFrench-language works237,207