Code-division multiplexing for in-service out-of-band monitoring of live FTTH-PONs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Feature Issue on Optical Code Division Multiple AccessWe propose, to the best of our knowledge, a novel in-service live fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) passive optical networks (PONs) management solution. Our solution uses a modified direct-sequence (DS) optical code-division multiplexing (OCDM) system and overcomes the optical time-domain reflectometry (OTDR) point-to-multipoint shortcomings. Our solution addresses various service provisioning and network maintenance challenges in PONs, alleviates their complexity, and reduces their operational cost. In addition, our system exploits passive devices (or encoders) to demark service provider ownership and responsibility from that of customers. Our OCDM-based management solution easily scales up from FTTH time-division multiplexing (TDM)-PON to WDM-PON and TDM/WDM-PON to support as many as a thousand customers, all using only one monitoring wavelength. We address the coding system and develop capacity curves for different PON scenarios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it