MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100786952 · doi:10.4319/lo.2008.53.5.1734

Propagation of an atmospheric climate signal to phytoplankton in a small marine basin

2008· article· en· W2100786952 on OpenAlexaffabout
William K. W. Li, W. G. Harrison

Bibliographic record

VenueLimnology and Oceanography · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsBedford Institute of Oceanography
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhytoplanktonPlanktonOceanographyEnvironmental scienceTrophic levelStratification (seeds)BacterioplanktonEcosystemWater columnSpring bloomAtmospheric sciencesEcologyNutrientBiologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 14‐yr record of weekly observations in Bedford Basin (Canada) was used to describe the direction and magnitude of departures from long‐term mean conditions in both climate and plankton components, for the purpose of detecting common patterns. Seasonal vertical stratification of the water column is determined primarily by temperature, but multiyear change in the annual deseasonalized average stratification is induced by salinity, which is linked to precipitation and river discharge. Stratification anomalies explain significant amounts of variability in the anomalies of nutrients and total phytoplankton biomass, especially that contributed by diatoms, but not the biomass of nanophytoplankton and picophytoplankton. Instead, the responses of the small phytoplankton groups appear directly related to temperature. Trophic linkage between phytoplankton and copepods is not statistically demonstrable, but there is strong evidence of linkage between phytoplankton and bacterioplankton. Temporal sign switching, which is the coherent departure from norm in both an ecosystem driver and response, strongly indicates the propagation of an atmospheric signal to phytoplankton in surface waters of Bedford Basin and thence further through trophic linkage and export.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.773

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLimnology and OceanographySame topicMarine and coastal ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207