MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100789187 · doi:10.1149/1.3429008

Dense Protective Coatings for SOFC Interconnect Deposited by Spray Pyrolysis

2010· article· en· W2100789187 on OpenAlex
Yongsong Xie, Wei Qu, Baisheng Yao, Nima Shaigan, Lars Rose

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh-Temperature Coating Behaviors
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceSpinelThermal sprayingPyrolysisDeposition (geology)Spray pyrolysisDiffusionMetallurgySubstrate (aquarium)Solid oxide fuel cellInterconnectionDopingChemical engineeringComposite materialCoatingOptoelectronicsChemistryElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spray pyrolysis deposition is a cost-effective process to deposit films of a wide variety of materials, especially solid oxides. In this study, spray pyrolysis deposition was used to deposit 2-3 μm thick Mn1.5Co1.5O4 spinel and Ta2O5-doped CeO2 on a ferritic stainless steel as protective coatings on SOFC interconnect. The coated samples were exposed to air at 1000oC to study the diffusion and oxidation behaviours. Characterization results indicated that the coatings are dense, have good adhesion to the substrate, and are stable and effective to prevent Cr outward diffusion at the high temperature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.348
Threshold uncertainty score0.895

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it