Age constraints in the double pulsar system J0737-3039
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigate the age constraints that can be placed on the double pulsar system using models for the spin-down of the first-born 22.7-ms Pulsar A and the 2.77-s Pulsar B with characteristic ages of 210 and 50 Myr, respectively. Standard models assuming dipolar spin-down of both pulsars suggest that the time since the formation of Pulsar B is ∼50 Myr, that is, close to Pulsar B's characteristic age. However, adopting models which account for the impact of Pulsar A's relativistic wind on Pulsar B's spin-down, we find that the formation of Pulsar B took place either 80 or 180 Myr ago, depending on the interaction mechanism. Formation 80 Myr ago, closer to Pulsar B's characteristic age, would result in the contribution from J0737−3039 to the inferred coalescence rates for double neutron star binaries increasing by 40 per cent. The 180 Myr age is closer to Pulsar A's characteristic age and would be consistent with the most recent estimates of the coalescence rate. The new age constraints do not significantly impact recent estimates of the kick velocity, tilt angle between pre- and post-supernova orbital planes or pre-supernova mass of Pulsar B's progenitor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".