MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100813828 · doi:10.1139/p03-116

Unified treatment of overlap integrals with integer and noninteger <i>n</i> Slater-type orbitals using translational and rotational transformations for spherical harmonics

2004· article· en· W2100813828 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
I. I. Guseinov, Б. А. Мамедов

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical functions and polynomials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSlater integralsPhysicsSpherical harmonicsInteger (computer science)Atomic orbitalPrincipal quantum numberType (biology)Quantum numberSlater determinantRotation (mathematics)Quantum mechanicsMathematical physicsHarmonicsOrder of integration (calculus)Slater-type orbitalMathematical analysisQuantumMathematicsLinear combination of atomic orbitalsGeometryElectron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A unified treatment of two-center overlap integrals over Slater-type orbitals (STO) with integer and noninteger values of the principal quantum numbers is described. Using translation and rotation formulas for spherical harmonics, the overlap integrals with integer and noninteger n Slater-type orbitals are expressed through the basic overlap integrals and spherical harmonics. The basic overlap integrals are calculated using auxiliary functions Aσ and Bk. The analytical relations obtained in this work are especially useful for the calculation of overlap integrals for large integer and noninteger principal quantum numbers. The formulas established in this study for overlap integrals can be used for the construction of series expansions based on addition theorems. PACS Nos.: 31.15.–p, 31.20.Ej

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicMathematical functions and polynomialsFrench-language works237,207