MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Historical Evolution of Thermomechanical Processes Applied to Aluminium Alloys

2006· article· en· W2100833631 on OpenAlexaff
H.J. McQueen

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials science forum · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMicrostructure and mechanical properties
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubstructureMaterials scienceMicrostructureMetallurgyExtrusionMetallographyAnnealing (glass)Thermomechanical processingAluminiumQuenching (fluorescence)Texture (cosmology)Grain sizeStructural engineeringComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thermo-mechanical processing (TMP), coined 50 years ago for steels to describe combined thermal and mechanical treatments that define both product shape and microstructure/properties, has been practiced since the early industrial revolution. The improved function and control in mechanical shaping equipment were easily adapted to newly discovered aluminum, integrating hot forming, cold deformation and annealing. The TMP goals for Al alloys were grain refinement, substructure preservation, texture control and enhanced precipitation. Hot extrusion became widely employed with exploitation of elongated grains with substructure and strong texture and of press heat treatment (solution during deformation, quenching upon exit). Rolling schedules were tuned to generate desired grain size/shape, substructure and texture. This historical account aims to enhance application of metallography to process optimization and innovation that makes metals more competitive with other materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.564

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials science forumSame topicMicrostructure and mechanical propertiesFrench-language works237,207