MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100884632 · doi:10.5539/mas.v3n9p95

The Performance Study of Hybrid-driving Differential Gear Trains

2009· article· en· W2100884632 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lei Wang, Yang Jian-cheng, Han Xiaoqin

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIterative Learning Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDifferential (mechanical device)Computer scienceTrainGear trainTest benchEncoderControl theory (sociology)Mechanism (biology)Controller (irrigation)Variable (mathematics)Automotive engineeringControl engineeringEngineeringControl (management)MathematicsArtificial intelligencePhysicsEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article in view of the differential gear trains theory characteristic, carried on the analysis to the mechanism performance, and obtained the best design scheme of the Hybrid-driving two degree of freedom differential gear trains. Adopted programmable logic controller (short for PLC) component and frequency converter to control the constant speed motor and the variable speed motor, developed a laboratory bench of Hybrid-driving two degree of freedom differential gear trains and utilized a encoder to gather the experimental data under this condition. This laboratory bench will be used as a research platform for basic theory of textile machinery and providing the rationale to optimize its variable speed mechanism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicIterative Learning Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207