Graft modification of crystalline nanocellulose by Cu(0)‐mediated SET living radical polymerization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Crystalline nanocellulose (CNC) was grafted with poly(methyl acrylate) (PMA) to yield modified CNC that is readily dispersed in a range of organic solvents [including tetrahydrofuran, chloroform, dimethylformamide, and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)], in contrast to native CNC which is dispersible primarily in aqueous solutions. First, a CNC macroinitiator with high bromine initiator density was prepared through a 1,1′‐carbonyldiimidazole‐mediated esterification reaction in DMSO‐based dispersant. MA was then grafted from the CNC macroinitiator through SET living radical polymerization (LRP) at room temperature using Cu(0) (copper wire) as the catalyst. The LRP grafting proceeded rapidly, with ∼30% monomer conversion achieved within 30 min, yielding approximately six times the mass of PMA with respect to CNC macroinitiator. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2015, 53, 2800–2808
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".