Impact of NOAA Ground-Based GPS Observations on the Canadian Regional Analysis and Forecast System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Half-hourly GPS zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD) and collocated surface weather observations of pressure, temperature, and relative humidity are available in near–real time from the NOAA Global Systems Division (GSD) research GPS receiver network. These observations, located primarily over the continental United States, are assimilated in a research version of the Environment Canada (EC) regional (North America) analysis and forecast system. The impact of the assimilation on regional analyses and 0–48-h forecasts is evaluated for two periods: summer 2004 and winter 2004/05. Forecasts are verified against radiosonde, rain gauge, and NOAA GPS network observations. The impacts of GPS ZTD and collocated surface weather observations for the summer period are generally positive, and include reductions in forecast errors for precipitable water, surface pressure, and geopotential height. It is shown that the ZTD data are primarily responsible for these forecast error reductions. The impact on precipitation forecasts is mixed, but more positive than negative, especially for the central U.S. region and for forecasts of larger precipitation amounts. Assimilation of the collocated surface weather data with ZTD contributes to the positive impact on precipitation forecasts for the central U.S. region. The NOAA GPS network data also have a positive impact on tropical storm system forecasts over the southeast United States, in terms of both storm track and precipitation. Impacts for the winter case are generally smaller because of the lower precipitable water (PW) over North America, but some positive impacts are observed for precipitation forecasts. The greatest regional impacts in the winter case are observed for the southeast U.S. (the Gulf) region where average PW is highest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".