MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100906516 · doi:10.1071/aseg2007ab136

Geometric Constraints for the Detection of Perfect Conductors

2007· article· en· W2100906516 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueASEG Extended Abstracts · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerospace and Aviation Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrical conductorFixed wingField (mathematics)DragWingComputer scienceAerospace engineeringGeometryMathematicsAcousticsAlgorithmPhysicsElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SummaryThe aim of this study was to investigate potential for the fixed wing Spectrem AEM system to detect perfect conductors. The methodology extends previous results in successful detection of perfect conductors in the twin helicopter Gemini AEM experiment. Primary fields in the square-wave Spectrem response are conventionally estimated by using the latest time samples in each halfcycle. Measured Spectrem aircraft attitude, coupled with physical constraints using tow-cable geometry and drag, were collectively used to devise a new primary field prediction for high altitude data. The new prediction method was then applied to survey data to produce a secondary field. Time constants predicted from the new secondary field estimation were sensitive to values 10 times greater than time constants using conventional late-time reference approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.899
Threshold uncertainty score0.294

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it